Badnarik, media and other crap on my mind.

I'm sort of all over the place this morning.

One moment I'm screaming about politics and wondering how it is that the mainstream media has so BLATENTLY ignored Michael Badnarik, and the next I am contemplating the finer points of lunch with friends.

Getting back to politics - I mean what does it take? A mountian gets more press than Badnarik. While I find the mountain interesting, I also find it interesting that we wasted a stack of public money for a long political commercial for the Republi-crats.

In other news,

Go visit Protect.org. Just read the page. I don't need to tell you why they need our support or why we need to fire judges that allow pedophiles to go with the admonition of "no further sexual acting out" or pass off opinions like this little tidbit:

A 40-year old man, William Pennington, raped a 10-year old relative. Judge Teiss departed downward sharply from sentencing guidelines, claiming the perpetrator was "not a pedophile" and that his crime was less serious because the victim was a family member.

So according to this judge, rape just isn't a serious crime when it is done to a family member? Anyone else see the failure in the logic here?.

yeah, I thought so.

More in a bit.